Once again, itâs Friday, which means it is time to sort through The Rootâs mailbag and soak in our readersâ reactions to the content posted this week. It has been an interesting seven days here, and this weekâs correspondence reveals an interesting mix of white tears, white fragility and butt-hurt Beckys. And yet we remain committed to answering your concerns because you, dear readers, are the reasons we exist. Letâs see what you had to say this week:
Suggested Reading
Dear Beckys,
First of all, Christine M. Carter, stop laughing. Sure, Iâm laughing, too, but Iâm giggling at the hilarity of a group of actual Beckys Beckying about an article about Beckys. Iâm laughing at how meta this all is. But you, Christine, are cyberbullying. Itâs different.
Second, to both Beckys, and to the Beckys around the globe, Iâd like to apologize. I separated Beckys into specific categories, but I was obviously wrong. I had no idea that there was an unrecognized class of Becky that managed to fit into every single category. You, dear sweethearts, are a rare find, and I apologize for leaving you out.
Iâd also like to commend you on the degree of difficulty of your tweets. This is the first time I have ever seen a ânot all white womenâ combined with the gymnastics of a #BlackLivesMatter, a 180-degree reverse-racism ending with a white-tears landing. I give it a 9.7, even though the Russian judge might disagree.
I would also like to address your fear of the terrible prospect of radical Becky terrorism sweeping the nation. While I specifically said that ânot all white women are Beckys,â perhaps I was not strong enough in my repudiation of Beckyphobia. I condemn both the anti-Becky violence and the Mike supremacists. There were bad people … on both sides.
#RebeccaLivesMatter
Dear David,
I was about to ask you why you tweeted this bullshit, but when I looked at your Twitter feed, I saw where you tweeted or retweeted swipes at Muslims, Jews, transgenders, blacks, little people and even Native Americans. And that was just this week! I wonât even paint you as a bigot for fucking with Yesha Callahan. That would be unfair. You are just a hateful, small little man.
Instead, Iâd like to use this opportunity to talk to you about your suits.
David, even though your pastime might be the childish act of belittling others on social media, you have gotta do something about your suit game, bruh. You canât just walk into J.C. Penney and grab a two-for-one deal and expect people to treat you seriously when you walking around looking like this.
What the fuck, David? Youâre a grown man, David. Iâm not even trying to be elitist, but you look like youâre going to court and borrowed a suit from your uncle.
And David, youâre white! Youâre letting the entire white community down when you walk around in that ill-fitting bullshit. You look like a âbeforeâ picture. You look like you bought that suit from Walgreens. You look like …
Wait. Oh, my God, David! Are you wearing black Reebok 5411s, Dave? No, Davey! Tell me you arenât wearing the âsecurity-guard specialsâ with your Walmart suit, Dave! Say it!
I listened to some of your music, David, and it actually sounded pretty good. I said that to show you that I am being forthright and honest with you. You play a pretty mean piano, even if you look like you bought your outfit after staring into the eclipse.
Maybe you donât care what I say, Dave. Iâm willing to bet you are probably evolved enough to think, âWhy should I concern myself with this petty asshole who doesnât even know me and hopped on his computer for nothing else but a desperate attempt to make me feel bad?â
Exactly, Dave.
Exactly.
From: Jim P.To: Michael HarriotSubject: Assimilate into whitenessMessage:
In your article âCharles Barkley Is A Great Example Of A Black White Supremacistâ you wrote:
âDoes anyone even listen to him at this point? Letâs set aside his basketball commentary for a minute (where I still find him to be the NBAâs most consistently entertaining and insightful commentator). Is there anyone who thinks that Barkleyâs statements about race reveal anything other than his repeated willingness to throw black people under the bus for our stupid unwillingness to assimilate into whiteness?â
Could you please explain to me what: âassimilate into whitenessâ means ?? Thank you very much.
Dear Jim,
Nah.
From: Mike S.To: Danielle BeltonSubject: Information DesiminationMessage:
On my phone I receive news alerts by choice. I just clicked on one concerning Megan Kelly. I was dismayed and deeply insulted (not an easy accomplishment at my age) over the unnecessary characterizing of Fox news viewers and any degree of a âfan of Ms. Kelly. Why do you find it necessary and purposeful to promote stereotypes and divisiveness? A great many of us resist and simply wonât fit your ideological boxes. I watch Fox, CNN,and MSNBC equally. I can tolerate Ms. Kelly and voted for Trump by default. Does this make me a âhaterâ and the other nasty attributes accorded in your commentary? And with that you have it; just report the news as your premise promises. Otherwise get a blog or write a book so at least the unwitting reader knows whatâs coming. Am unsubscribing as we speak, so now you have collateral damage with those just trying to inform. Again to quote Reba âWHYâ???
Hey, Old White Mike,
No, Iâm not stereotyping by calling you âoldâ and âwhite.â Iâm basing my assumption on the fact that the median age for the Fox News Channelâs audience is 68, which means half its viewers are older than 68, and 92 percent of FNCâs viewers are white. Plus, I guessed you were old because you seem to be unaware that all of the news you get on your phone comes from a âblog.â Iâm sorry to inform you that Danielle Belton isnât a news genie sitting at a desk watching the news and yelling, âQuick, whereâs my wand? I gotta send this to White Mikeâs phone! He might like this!â
The fact that you can tolerate Megyn Kelly, voted for Donald Trump and will fire off an email to defend Fox News tells me that you actually fit into an ideological box, and that box probably wouldnât like it here. The magician who sent that article to your phone probably wasnât aware of that fact.
But your email raises a larger point, Mike. I bet you hate Hillary Clinton as much as the elf who typed that article inside your telephone dislikes Kelly. I bet your reasons are valid. You probably think sheâs a liar and a shady old lady who deletes emails and faints all the time. I think she is, too. And even though I would rather have her for president than Pumpkin Spice Pol Pot, neither my dislike of Trump, your dislike of Clinton nor the cellphone fairyâs dislike of Kelly is divisive.
The tiny little sprite typists at The Root are often criticized for spreading divisiveness every time we point out racism. People (and by âpeopleâ I mean wypipo) accuse us of further dividing America by shining a light on white supremacy. We are even called racists because we always talk about race, which is as stupid as accusing a doctor of making you sick because he or she is always talking about illness and disease.
Iâm sorry you unsubscribed, White Mike, but this probably wasnât the place for you. We have already recalled our little gnome from inside your phone. Thank you for your email.
The next comment comes from the following article:
Wait, lordofb, donât go!
I didnât mean it. Iâm sorry Monique Judge laughed. She probably thought the idea of a light poke at white people was funny. She probably had no idea that anyone could possibly be so fragile that they would take that little section of a lighthearted sentence and blow it up into being butt-hurt. She probably thought that someone who knows how to log onto the internet was aware that there is a little-known combination of language and humor called a âjoke.â
Monique was wrong.
Iâm willing to bet you that if you asked Monique, she had no idea that her laughter could hurt someone. I bet Monique is so insensitive that she laughs at most jokes. I bet she laughs at the Popeyes commercial with the gospel singer wailing about fried chicken. I bet she laughs every time she hears the words âinner cityâ or âurban,â knowing that most cities and urban areas are predominantly white. I bet she laughs when politicians are asked about black topics and they default to talking points about crime and unemployment. I bet she laughs her ass off.
You know what else, lordofb? I am willing to betâand Monique has never told me this personally, so Iâm just guessing hereâthat maybe every now and then she hears a joke that pokes fun at white people. Iâm sure she doesnât hear it often, because it has never, ever been a thing in comedy, journalism or America. But Iâm going to suspend my disbelief and say it happens every now and then. Maybe itâs while sheâs reading The Root or maybe itâs while … umm … OK, letâs say itâs only when sheâs reading The Root.
Letâs say, in that moment, someone makes an innocuous joke about white people. Letâs say they call a white woman a âBeckyâ or slip in a half-sentence about Caucasiansâ predilection for sticking their noses into everything.
Even though there are only a few places that she can even hear that premise about white people, and she can literally hear some form of that premise everywhere about black people, Monique shouldnât take that opportunity to smile. Even if neither the joke nor her chuckle injures a single white soul. Even if they will still be exempt from the hate, prejudice, sly looks and exclusion that Monique wades through every moment of her goddamn life, what gives her the right to smile, lordofb? How fucking dare she?
Iâm going to have a word with her about this.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.