According to Wypipopedia, racism has been around for at least nine or 10 years. It started with the election of President Barack Obama, who invented racism in a Kenyan laboratory with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinsky and that terrorist dude from the Weather Underground. (I know his name is Bill Ayers. Iâm just using his white-people name.)
Ever since Obama released this terrible plague into our society, people much smarter than I have been trying to solve the racism riddle and banish it from the planet. Theyâve tried sensitivity training, revising history to make the Civil War about statesâ rights andâmost notablyâdeveloping an antidote called âreverse racism.â
Suggested Reading
But the scientists here at The Root have finally figured out a cure. Our researchers ran our most racist emails, tweets, comments and direct messages through our proprietary software and analyzed the results. They detected a pattern that shows racism is inversely proportional to the ability to spell, capitalize and punctuate.
Yes, the cure for racism is grammar lessons.
Today we share our peer-reviewed study. (Although, to be fair, Deputy Managing Editor Yesha Callahan does not consider me her peer.)
[Editorâs note: Wait .. I thought you said âpear.â No, I donât consider you my pear. âYesha]
(Sidenote: Instead of including our positive emails at the end, this week they will be used as control subjects for our data comparisons.)
Here are our results:
In our first test case, we examined the responses to our article on O.J. Simpson:
From: ConnorTo: Michael Harriot
you are such a smug racist spewing piece of shit. Donât hate white people of this generation you fuck; we didânt do shit to you or your race. stop spewing hate. the fact you celebrated OJâs acquittal shows how dumb you are. karmas a bitch. really hope someone doesnât murder someone close to you. imagine that feeling you narcissistic fuck.
This is an example of our typical racist reader. Notice the lack of capitalization at the beginning of each sentence, something most people learn in their early elementary school years. While I am thankful for his hope that someone close to me isnât murdered, I question his use of a semicolon instead of a period. It could be a mistake, but when I combine that oversight with the fact that he misplaced an apostrophe in âdidnâtâ and just eliminated the one in âkarmaâs,â it shows how grammar has affected his mind state.
None of this indicates that the reader is dumb becauseâwonder of wondersâhe didnât misspell ânarcissistic.â Plus, unlike some of our most racist readers, he didnât sprinkle ellipses throughout his message.
Now letâs take a look at a thread from a Twitter user who doesnât appear to be racist:
Now, Sarah, in her egalitarian white feminism, simply wanted to inject her narrative into an article that had nothing to do with her. She wanted to discuss sexism in an article that was specifically about police brutality and black lives. She wasnât necessarily being racist. She was exemplifying the white privilege that seeks to change every conversation and divert it to a subject she wants to talk about. As such, her only mistake (other than a comma instead of a semicolon after âI understand youâ) was spelling âsayâ as âday.â
See … not as racist, better grammar.
And, finally, this:
From: EdithTo: Michael Harriot
I really enjoyed your article on OJ. I guess Iâm one of the few white Americans who really thought he was innocent. I recorded but havenât watched the Fox News interview but I will now very soon.
I like to think that everyone judges people by their character and not the color of their skin but I know Iâm wrong. At 67 it is hard to understand why in this day and age color is still so harsh a feeling by some people. I grew up while the civil rights movement was in full force and saw the injustices that were going on in Selma. I guess I have spent my life wearing those 60âs âRose Colored Glassesâ but it was easier than reality.
We now have a man in the Oval Office (I refuse to call him President) who does nothing but preach hate belittles people. He is doing everything in his power to destroy all the good things that President Obama accomplished. I voted for President Obama twice and would have voted for him a third time if I could have had that privilege. Iâm praying constantly for impeachment but Iâm not sure it will happen.
I work with black women that are some of the greatest women Iâve ever had the privilege of knowing. We are all nurses and they are great. How anyone can judge a person by their color instead of their character is beyond my school of thought. Throughout my career as a nurse I have had the honor of taking care of many people of color that were amazing. I have heard of the difficulties of being black from the 1930âs and onward. Some stories were absolutely fascinating while others just ripped your heart out. I canât imagine how black people felt with the way they were treated.
Iâm also very proud that I have never treated anyone the way blacks have been treated. I think my parents had a great deal to do with that.
I know you probably wonât read all of this and I canât say Iâd blame you if you didnât but I wanted you to know there are some people out here who grew up in your parents or grandparents day that didnât grow up thinking they were better than people of color. My daddy use to tell my brother and me that âthere was not one person in the world better than we were and there isnât one person in the world that we are better than anyoneâ. I just know that if we remove our skin we all look the same.
You, Mr. Harriot, have managed to be the person that I elected to send my rants and raves at because of that dummy in the Oval Office, he is the one person that we are all better than. I get so angry at his actions I find myself hoping he will meet his Lee Harvey Oswald soon and I know thatâs not right.
Please know that believe it or not I donât write people like this but your writing was really great. I know you have probably turned blue at the length of some of my sentences but thatâs ok, youâre right. Keep up the good work and please pray for a Democrat win EVERYWHERE.
Thanks for listening. God Bless.
Sincerely yours
Edith
Now, Iâm not trying to grammar-shame anyone, but this is from a white woman. Notice thatâinstead of saying that she doesnât see colorâshe acknowledges the fact that she can actually tell the difference between black women and everyone else!
Not racist. Better grammar.
Good looking out, Edith.
This week, News Editor Breanna Edwards rankled a legion of white people when she wrote an article about the sentient colostomy bag who smeared her bodily fluids all over her roommateâs belongings and got off Scott-free.
I honestly canât explain why they were upset … they just were. They werenât just mad … they were big mad. Take this comment, for example:
From: LT1990To: Breanna Edwards
Dont even have to read the article to know that it is written by a racist bitch. Just because that nasty bitch got off with little more than a warning, it doesnât mean it had anything to do with her race. STOP RACE BAITING!
Thatâs kinda racist. You will notice that the only egregious error is the lack of an apostrophe in âdonât.â But it gets worse:
From: FUCKTHEOBAMASTo: Breanna Edwards
Author is a RACIST. CUNT AND A SLAG.
See howâas he or she upped the racism anteâthe number of capital letters increased? And whatâs with the random period?
Also, Iâd like to point out that, for black people, âcuntâ is not really a thing. I understand that itâs one of the worst white insults, ranking second only to âwhite people.â Also, what is a slag? Iâm sure I could look it up, but I donât know if I want to know.
Also, I donât think I want that in my Google search history.
Hereâs another one:
From: SNOWFLAKETo: Breanna Edwards
Just goes to show you your BL DONâT MATTER any more than anyone elses. Your still 2nd class. Better yet NO CLASS THATS WHY YOU LIVE IN GHETTOS ITS WERE YOU BELONG.
Case closed.
And finally, this series of comments on the article about cultural appropriation and Bruno Mars:
From: borgohugisTo: Michael Harriot
One of the other hallmarks of appropriation is using someoneâs culture to demean, make fun of or diminish it.
Itâs demeaning when money is made from Black music but doesnât go to Black people. Itâs demeaning when Black music is used to gain influence and power to a person that is not Black. Itâs making fun of Black people when a non-Black person pretends and is a mockery of Black music, dance and culture. It diminishes the Black legacy because Black artists arenât getting awards for the Black music they create. This deprives us of historical records and credit.
Michael, I donât know whatâs going on but a pattern is emerging. A black woman broke this shit down and you said ânopeâ. When MoâNique broke the shit down, you said ânopeâ. Why is your response ânopeâ when your argument is as weak as âOr maybe theyâre just tired of seeing Bruno Marsâ. Wut?? You see fit to use your aunties as proof of Blackness but you are never here supporting the words of Black women. This shit is fucked up and you need to start thinking about what and who you are trying to support. If it isnât the words of Black women then I donât even know why you see fit to write anything especially something as weak as this. Bills must be paid and clicks must be had but damn do you really have to do it at the expense of Black women who are speaking truth?
From: KalxTo: borgohugis
Thank you for saying this. Iâve been noticing that I disagree with Michaelâs takes 87% of the time. Itâs mind numbing at this point. Heâs a lot like Charlemagne the Charlatan.
From: borgohugis
To: Kalx
When he round about defended Charlemagne was egregious enough. Also the writing is so weak. He tries to wrap up the header in the last paragraph with the flimsiest reason after spending half the article giving evidence that goes against his argument.
Dearest borgohugis and Kalx,
I could tell you that I am the least sexist person I know and that I donât see gender. I could easily dismiss your criticism by saying that some of my best friends are black women (actually, just three; but three count as âsome,â right?).
Instead of rejecting your comments out of hand, I did what I wish some white readers would do. I examined myself and what you call âa patternâ that is emerging in my work. I didnât just examine myself; I examined my content. Hereâs what I found:
In 2018, I have written 148 stories for The Root. Twenty-five of those stories were about, or had something to do with, black women. Here is the list of black women I said ânopeâ to:
Seren Sensai: Although I disagree with you on characterizing what I said as ânope.â I specifically said she âmakes a convincing argument breaking down why Mars is a derivative artist,â and that âEvery single word Sensei said was correct, but none of it defined cultural appropriation.â If you disagree on my interpretation, that is fine, but you should know that this article was sparked by my hearing the argument from men and women about cultural appropriation.
Omarosa Manigault Newman: I admit that I wholeheartedly disagree with almost everything she does. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me.
Priyanka Banks: A reality-TV star actress who sued her sorority for kicking her out of Delta Sigma Theta.
Karima Garner: A black woman whose actions I vehemently disagreed with … only because she killed another woman by injecting her booty with Home Depot silicone.
Thatâs the list.
Notice that list does not include MoâNique because when the âboycott Netflixâ debate emerged, I was one of the first writers not only to defend her position but also to attempt to dissect it using the history and economics of Hollywood.
Even in the article you pointed out, I concluded:
I wish I had MoâNiqueâs level of confidence and self-value. The idea that others cannot determine the value of your work is an important lesson. Maybe she should treat people better. Maybe she isnât as funny or as popular as she and her âDaddyâ believes (I feel like I should put my name on the sex offenderâs registry every time I type that), but her willingness to say âFuck your couchâ and stand on principle is admirable.
MoâNique is right. Black is often devalued because it is black. Women are often lowballed because they are women. It is difficult to live in that reality and reject it as a reason that she believes Netflix undervalued her. Even if she is wrong about Netflix, her larger point is also correct.
Again, I donât object to your characterization of my argument, even if you feel like I sided with âCharlemagne the Charlatanâ or didnât castigate him enough. Maybe I didnât write it well enough or left it open to interpretation. Perhaps I was too evenhanded. I can accept that. I find it interesting that you think I dismissed MoâNique while other readers thought I sided with MoâNique too much.
In fact, one particular reader disliked my initial commentary so much that he called to explain his viewpoint as soon as the article appeared. I canât reveal our conversation, but letâs just say he is a high-ranking executive for a company that rhymes with âMetflix.â
Again, I donât dismiss your criticism. If either of you feels that I am dismissive of black women or that I am wrong 87 percent of the time, I invite you to skip my byline. I canât imagine reading someone whose writing was âso weakâ and was so wrong so often.
It is my job to examine and critique race and culture. I try not to be too thin-skinned to accept the backlash or to ignore those who are critical of me. But Kalyx and borgohugis, I must admit that your comments made me rethink a lot of my prejudices for one reason:
Your grammar was impeccable.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.