If you hear somebody quote the Bible outside of church, itâs usually not a good sign. The occasional gasp of âJesus Christâ or âGaht damnâ and various forms of âJesus be a fenceâ are all right, but those arenât really Bible quotes and could denote anything from having missed the bus to winning the daily Lotto at the Kwik Shop.
Actually, quoting the Bible is usually unnecessary because if youâre doing Jesusâ work, you probably donât have to quote his instruction booklet to convince people that youâre doing the right thing. If you give a homeless guy some money, you donât have quote Luke 6:20-21ââBlessed are you who are poor, for yours is the Kingdom of Godââbecause itâs obvious youâre doing something kind and righteous.
Suggested Reading
In fact, usually the only times you hear people quoting the Bible is when theyâre about to do or have done some foul nonsense and they want to justify it. (I mean, doesnât every conflicted action hero mumble, âForgive them, father, for they know not what they do,â right before doing some John Wick-level violence to 30 people in an underground cocaine den?)
So Thursday, when Attorney General Jeff Sessions justified Americaâs despicable practice of separating parents from children at the U.S. border by quoting the Bible, that shouldâve been a sign to the world that he was up to no good.
Just about every religious organization on the planet has condemned the U.S. decision to separate families at the border. Catholic bishops have even contemplated sending clergy to these âdetentionâ camps in order to investigate exactly how these men, women and children are being treated. Sessions, whose own United Methodist Church declared former President Barack Obamaâs and President Donald Trumpâs immigration policies too cruel, decided to drop the clergy clapback with his own verse at a meeting of law enforcement officials at Parkview Stadium in Fort Wayne, Ind., on Thursday.
âPersons who violate the law of our nation are subject to prosecution. I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13 to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order,â Sessions said, according to New York magazineâs Daily Intelligencer. âOrderly and lawful processes are good in themselves and protect the weak and lawful.â
I believe at that point the entire room began to shake, and a lightning bolt struck the podium, leaving the word âWrongâ burned across the stage. But those are unconfirmed rumors.
First, we live in a secular democracy, which means Iâm never happy when any elected official or representative of the government starts justifying policy on the basis of faith. Certainly not from a party that backs neo-Nazis and apparent pedophiles. More importantly, Iâm not a biblical scholar, but absolute deference to the government doesnât sound like anything I learned in my 10 years of mandated Sunday school lessons.
What Sessions said boils down to this: God has dominion over everything, and the government exists only through Godâs grace, so therefore the government is an extension of God and should never be challenged. That sounds like a recipe for religious authoritarianism to me.
Which shouldnât surprise anyone. His use of this quote puts Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III in very special company. Paulâs Epistle to the Romans 13 has been used by just about every horrible authoritarian government in history to justify any act of racism, violence or oppression.
Slave owners used it to justify the Fugitive Slave Act.
Hitler used Romans 13 to rebuke Christians who rejected the rise of his Nazi Party. South African apartheid leaders used Romans 13 to justify their subjugation of the black population of the country. In other words, there just isnât a lot of precedent in world history for anyone quoting Romans 13 to justify fealty to the laws of government, unless that government is up to no good.
Itâs also worth noting that, like most forked tongue representatives of the Trump administration, Sessions is intentionally lying and conflating to justify his bigotry anyway. Sessions would have you believe that everyone at the border is breaking the law, so taking their kids is not only a deterrent to future border crossings but also a necessary evil in order to manage the large population of people seeking entry into the United States.
Verily I say unto thee, thatâs white nationalist trash. Many of the families at the border are asylum seekers, and that is completely legal. Asylum seekers have the right to come here, seek asylum and wait for a court date (which is usually more than a year), and it will be either accepted or rejected. What is happening now is the equivalent of a woman going to the cops to escape an abusive husband, so they label her a criminal, throw her in jail and put her kids in foster care … and then they admit they lost her kids six weeks later.
Large numbers of people crossing at our southern border are not criminals; they are not breaking the law; and under no circumstances should they be subjected to this kind of abject violence and degradation. Iâm not sure what kind of Christian government thinks itâs good policy to snatch breastfeeding kids away from their mothers, put children in internment camps with murals of a smiling Trump on the walls, or lose who knows how many kids to child traffickers and perverts, but apparently thatâs the kind of government Sessions thinks God is down with. So sayeth the Lord.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.